Re: Olympus Camera, Stuart Martin & the photos

by **Tony Bennett** 14.11.14 18:53

Woofer wrote:
Ask Hobs - I bet she'll say never believe the person who over-eggs the pudding. Rather than just saying `she looked gorgeous', she has to describe the whole bloomin' outfit - one is almost waiting to hear the exact shape of the sandals and the exact tone of pink clothes and where she bought them all.

...and there are so many other examples:

* the long description about the hair-bead on the Last Photo

* ditto about buying Gerry's sunglasses on the Last Photo

* the detailed descriptions about the alleged visit of David Payne to G5A at 6.30pm on 3 May - so much fluff and detail - yet with 20 flat contradictions between their accounts, it's pretty obvious the visit never took place!

* the tea stain on Madeleine's pyjamas

by Doug D 14.11.14 19:39

Jeanmonroe:

‘SOMEONE'S TELLING 'PORKIES'!!!’

Without dragging the thread into the vagaries of the tennis photo, which has got its own threads, according to KH1 (p.57) the kids had to run around the court at the end of the mini-tennis to pick up as many balls as possible.

It’s been queried before, but I have never seen an answer regarding the tennis balls used.

I would have expected littl’uns to be using foam balls, not proper tennis balls.

If someone who has actually been to PdL could let us know what type of balls they actually use for the mini-tennis, this information could rubbish the claim about this photo in one hit.

by **sharonl** 14.11.14 19:53

Doug D wrote:Looking at photos & statements re the last photo/sun thread and this bit jumped out which is just something else that doesn’t make a lot of sense.

8^th May. 21.00 Olympus C50 delivered to home address of Stuart Martin
9^th May. 0830 SM took video camera to Hants Police HQ
9^th May. ? Commenced investigation of two memory cards from camera
Forensic photographic examination of cards plus 116 photos that he found. (116 @ say 5 minutes each(?) = 10 hours)

9^th May ? GM & MW both deliver CD’s of photo’s to the PJ.

It must have been late in the day that SM got round to burning the CD’s, so how did GM & MW have them to deliver to the PJ that day? Even if e-mailed across, photos took ages to send in those days and often exceeded the e-mail capacity if you tried to send more than one at a time.

[/url]

This is from Jim Gamble, 21 May 2007. Could assistance have been available sooner than we know?

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id280.html

"These are the pictures we want and we want you to upload them onto a new website.

"Alternatively if you are not sure then go into any photographic shop and ask them to help you upload them onto the site. You will also find a basic 'how to' guide on the site to help you.

"We will then assess those pictures – at a rate of 1,000 pictures per hour – so that over a quick period of time we will pass meaningful information to the Portuguese authorities."

by **PeterMac** 14.11.14 22:37

Gamble is in this right up to his neck, right from the beginning.
On his own admission he is involved in organising the tampering with evidence, and therefore 'strictly' Perverting the Course of Justice.
Why.
Is this the same guy who went to Thailand and procured some children - just to show that it could be done, of course, which i think most people already knew ?

by **sharonl** 14.11.14 23:01

PeterMac wrote:Gamble is in this right up to his neck, right from the beginning.
On his own admission he is involved in organising the tampering with evidence, and therefore 'strictly' Perverting the Course of Justice.
Why.
Is this the same guy who went to Thailand and procured some children - just to show that it could be done, of course, which i think most people already knew ?

He claims that he was making a film of some sort.

As he had no jurisdiction in Cambodia and could do nothing to help those children, why on earth did the former head of CEOP go out there only to come back and ADVERTISE where these kids were available? Its absolutely shocking that anyone could do that, but a man of his position?

In addition to that, he has this INEQE company that advises schools on internet security for children yet he believes that paedophiles that do view images online should not be too harshly punished.

Then we have a suspect in a missing child case being given confidential CEOP manuals, his CATS entry disappearing and he accompanies Gamble at the police bravery awards

I have serious concerns about this guy, he is shocking.

by pennylane 15.11.14 8:57

sharonl wrote:
PeterMac wrote:Gamble is in this right up to his neck, right from the beginning.
On his own admission he is involved in organising the tampering with evidence, and therefore 'strictly' Perverting the Course of Justice.
Why.
Is this the same guy who went to Thailand and procured some children - just to show that it could be done, of course, which i think most people already knew ?

He claims that he was making a film of some sort.

As he had no jurisdiction in Cambodia and could do nothing to help those children, why on earth did the former head of CEOP go out there only to come back and ADVERTISE where these kids were available? Its absolutely shocking that anyone could do that, but a man of his position?

In addition to that, he has this INEQE company that advises schools on internet security for children yet he believes that paedophiles that do view images online should not be too harshly punished.

Then we have a suspect in a missing child case being given confidential CEOP manuals, his CATS entry disappearing and he accompanies Gamble at the police bravery awards

I have serious concerns about this guy, he is shocking.

I agree PM and sharon!

JG has a lot to hide (imo), and that's why he never shuts up. Just like his two infamous child-neglecting mates. The best defense is a good offense, and I find all three of them grossly offensive!