Sonia Poulton video 'We are not trolls to question disappearance of Madeleine McCann'

jeanmonroe wrote:Would anyone, here, care to 'hazard' a guess as to what media 'story, sighting, 'exclusive', update, suspect, etc.,' (as a 'distraction'' away from BL's 'inquest', 'look here, not there') we'll be subjected to, before, or on, Thursday, 18th, December, 2014, (the date of BL's 'inquest') in 'connection' with the SY/OG 'investigation' into Madeleine's 'disappearance'?

eta: DCI Redwood has only got 7 more 'sleeps' before he retires.

aquila wrote:I just want to add that over the road the latest posts from people who disagree with Cristobell have just been removed within the last few minutes. There's been quite a discussion going on over there which I thought was fair - apparently not. Censorship abounds.

aquila wrote:Snippet from Cristobell's blog today:

"... from the start, I have been trying to get the truth behind this cover up into the public domain, and I foolishly believed that that was what we were all here for".

aquila wrote:I just want to add that over the road the latest posts from people who disagree with Cristobell have just been removed within the last few minutes. There's been quite a discussion going on over there which I thought was fair - apparently not. Censorship abounds.

Resistor's comments are worth diddly squat so it would seem. However, Cristobell managed to post up the most dreadful comment from someone on her blog about Resistor yesterday.

aquila wrote:I just want to add that over the road the latest posts from people who disagree with Cristobell have just been removed within the last few minutes. There's been quite a discussion going on over there which I thought was fair - apparently not. Censorship abounds.

Resistor's comments are worth diddly squat so it would seem. However, Cristobell managed to post up the most dreadful comment from someone on her blog about Resistor yesterday.

aquila wrote:Here is a snippet from Cristobell's blog today.

When I began commenting on this case, absolutely no-one within the mainstream media was questioning the patently absurd abduction story. I wanted to know why, and the clumsy attempts by Team McCann to cover it up, made it all the more fascinating still.  I'm one of those people that when someone tells me not to do something I do the opposite.  I have a get out of jail free card, confirmation of lunacy from two renowned psychiatrists.  Much as I want to keep my trap shut, I just can't.  But, I digress, from the start, I have been trying to get the truth behind this cover up into the public domain, and I foolishly believed that that was what we were all here for.

Joss wrote:I really don't know why people give CB & SP a platform when it is obvious their only interest seems to be for what's in it for them and self promoting of their diatribe etc. CB has her own blog to do that for those that wish to partake, and i think SP has her own site too? I am personally sick of their passive/aggressive rantings that people seem to fall into their web of getting caught up in the dramatics of the two nobodies that at the end of the day will not help Madeleine's cause for Justice in any way that i can perceive. JMO.

Verdi wrote:

Joss wrote:I really don't know why people give CB & SP a platform when it is obvious their only interest seems to be for what's in it for them and self promoting of their diatribe etc. CB has her own blog to do that for those that wish to partake, and i think SP has her own site too? I am personally sick of their passive/aggressive rantings that people seem to fall into their web of getting caught up in the dramatics of the two nobodies that at the end of the day will not help Madeleine's cause for Justice in any way that i can perceive. JMO.

I think your words answer your own question Joss.  To use the name of Madeleine McCann and now that of Brenda Leyland as arrow fodder and/or to further a career and/or to further an agenda is beyond despicable.  That is what this pair of egotists are doing on a daily basis and that is the reason I won't let the matter drop.

If they would just shut the hell up and go away then I would have nothing more to say but all the time they keep parping on about the impossible, they are tempting criticism.  Of course they both wallow in the attention be it positive or be it negative so, in a manner of speaking people such as I only encourage them (partly no doubt their reason) - but be that as it may they can't be allowed to use two innocent victims to further their united cause, victims that can't answer for themselves.

aquila wrote:

Joss wrote:

Verdi wrote:

Joss wrote:I really don't know why people give CB & SP a platform when it is obvious their only interest seems to be for what's in it for them and self promoting of their diatribe etc. CB has her own blog to do that for those that wish to partake, and i think SP has her own site too? I am personally sick of their passive/aggressive rantings that people seem to fall into their web of getting caught up in the dramatics of the two nobodies that at the end of the day will not help Madeleine's cause for Justice in any way that i can perceive. JMO.

I think your words answer your own question Joss.  To use the name of Madeleine McCann and now that of Brenda Leyland as arrow fodder and/or to further a career and/or to further an agenda is beyond despicable.  That is what this pair of egotists are doing on a daily basis and that is the reason I won't let the matter drop.

If they would just shut the hell up and go away then I would have nothing more to say but all the time they keep parping on about the impossible, they are tempting criticism.  Of course they both wallow in the attention be it positive or be it negative so, in a manner of speaking people such as I only encourage them (partly no doubt their reason) - but be that as it may they can't be allowed to use two innocent victims to further their united cause, victims that can't answer for themselves.

BBM, I agree Verdi, but they are not going to shutup and go away, at least CB isn't because she keeps reiterating that to all those who wish she would just STFU and go away. And now from what was stated by her and quoted a few posts back on this thread, she is saying she has her get out of jail free card, (whatever she is insinuating there?), because a couple of renowned psychiatrists have certified her as a lunatic,(in her own words). So that begs the question how do you even have a rational conversation with a certified lunatic? I think its an impossibility and probably a waste of time and effort with no result of anything sane. She is best ignored IMO.

Sonia Poulton interviewed the loony Birch on TPV. She also interviewed loony Shrimpton. She then went on to recruit Cristobell who has openly said she has been certified by a couple of renowned psychiatrists as a lunatic and this is where it gets even more interesting. Poulton then went on to introduce Daubney to Cristobell in a Sun expose of being a troll.

During Poulton's TPV interview with Cristobell she said she was an avid reader of Cristobell's blogs. Well all I can say is that from what I read of Cristobell's blogs at that time I wouldn't have considered her any authority on the case of the disappearance of Madeleine and much of Cristobell's blogs were about her struggle with diabetes, weight issues, being an empty nester, being lonely, being picked on by trollish people, enjoying the fight etc. Now ask yourself why Poulton chose Hutton in the first place? (that's before Poulton left TPV under a cloud after only a few short weeks calling Icke's finances into question).

Hutton is now Poulton's greatest asset, spouting endless prose on how the media works and considering herself 'part of the team' of some sort of documentary and not knowing if she'll 'make the final cut' (that would be the titbit Poulton produced with Hutton behind the camera at a Scottish lake where Sky News withheld the identity of the dossier compiler) ...but hey 'that's showbiz for you' Cristobell says in her few very few posts on MMM in the time she's been on that forum. 510 posts since August 2014 doesn't constitute much except to denigrate CMoMM, Tony Bennett, Jill Havern and sadly in the last couple of days members of MMM.

If you want to cheapen the case of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann who better to start with than Birch, Shrimpton and Hutton.

Just my opinion.

ETA: Who can forget Cristobell saying on CMoMM that she was excited to be interviewed on TPV and Martin Grime might also be making an appearance which turned out (so she said when pressed) was given to her by DM on Twitter.....now who would have done such a thing.

sonic72 wrote:She comes across as just a media puppet. The fact she still works for the MSM whilst supposedly having opposing views smells to high heaven.

Do not trust imo.

aquila wrote:

Joss wrote:

Verdi wrote:

Joss wrote:I really don't know why people give CB & SP a platform when it is obvious their only interest seems to be for what's in it for them and self promoting of their diatribe etc. CB has her own blog to do that for those that wish to partake, and i think SP has her own site too? I am personally sick of their passive/aggressive rantings that people seem to fall into their web of getting caught up in the dramatics of the two nobodies that at the end of the day will not help Madeleine's cause for Justice in any way that i can perceive. JMO.

I think your words answer your own question Joss.  To use the name of Madeleine McCann and now that of Brenda Leyland as arrow fodder and/or to further a career and/or to further an agenda is beyond despicable.  That is what this pair of egotists are doing on a daily basis and that is the reason I won't let the matter drop.

If they would just shut the hell up and go away then I would have nothing more to say but all the time they keep parping on about the impossible, they are tempting criticism.  Of course they both wallow in the attention be it positive or be it negative so, in a manner of speaking people such as I only encourage them (partly no doubt their reason) - but be that as it may they can't be allowed to use two innocent victims to further their united cause, victims that can't answer for themselves.

BBM, I agree Verdi, but they are not going to shutup and go away, at least CB isn't because she keeps reiterating that to all those who wish she would just STFU and go away. And now from what was stated by her and quoted a few posts back on this thread, she is saying she has her get out of jail free card, (whatever she is insinuating there?), because a couple of renowned psychiatrists have certified her as a lunatic,(in her own words). So that begs the question how do you even have a rational conversation with a certified lunatic? I think its an impossibility and probably a waste of time and effort with no result of anything sane. She is best ignored IMO.

Sonia Poulton interviewed the loony Birch on TPV. She also interviewed loony Shrimpton. She then went on to recruit Cristobell who has openly said she has been certified by a couple of renowned psychiatrists as a lunatic and this is where it gets even more interesting. Poulton then went on to introduce Daubney to Cristobell in a Sun expose of being a troll.

During Poulton's TPV interview with Cristobell she said she was an avid reader of Cristobell's blogs. Well all I can say is that from what I read of Cristobell's blogs at that time I wouldn't have considered her any authority on the case of the disappearance of Madeleine and much of Cristobell's blogs were about her struggle with diabetes, weight issues, being an empty nester, being lonely, being picked on by trollish people, enjoying the fight etc. Now ask yourself why Poulton chose Hutton in the first place? (that's before Poulton left TPV under a cloud after only a few short weeks calling Icke's finances into question).

Hutton is now Poulton's greatest asset, spouting endless prose on how the media works and considering herself 'part of the team' of some sort of documentary and not knowing if she'll 'make the final cut' (that would be the titbit Poulton produced with Hutton behind the camera at a Scottish lake where Sky News withheld the identity of the dossier compiler) ...but hey 'that's showbiz for you' Cristobell says in her few very few posts on MMM in the time she's been on that forum. 510 posts since August 2014 doesn't constitute much except to denigrate CMoMM, Tony Bennett, Jill Havern and sadly in the last couple of days members of MMM.

If you want to cheapen the case of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann who better to start with than Birch, Shrimpton and Hutton.

Just my opinion.

ETA: Who can forget Cristobell saying on CMoMM that she was excited to be interviewed on TPV and Martin Grime might also be making an appearance which turned out (so she said when pressed) was given to her by DM on Twitter.....now who would have done such a thing.