McCanns dispute DCI Redwood's dismissal of Tannerman

canada12 wrote:It's where Kate's left hand is that has me intrigued. (Gerry's look frightens me too!)

BlueBag wrote:This is what Jane Tanner claims she saw.. to scale!!!

50 meters away.



If you have the screen at arms length then you will have the right scale. That is how much of her field of vision was taken by Tannerman.

All scientifically tested this morning, hope the neighbours were not watching.

Now what details did she say she saw?

There is the lighting to consider as well.

XTC wrote:

BlueBag wrote:This is what Jane Tanner claims she saw.. to scale!!!

50 meters away.



If you have the screen at arms length then you will have the right scale. That is how much of her field of vision was taken by Tannerman.

All scientifically tested this morning, hope the neighbours were not watching.

Now what details did she say she saw?

There is the lighting to consider as well.

According to the LP rogatory interviews:

4078 “How far away from you were they at the closest point?”
Reply “Phew, as, I mean, it’s hard to, sort of thing, but I think I was sort of halfway, it’s
probably sort of five metres, I mean, I’m trying to sort of think in terms of this room,
but sort of probably just further than that wall, probably sort of five to ten metres id’
say, if, I don’t know how far it is to there, but”.
4078 “I would say probably about, I am just guessing, but two and a half to three metres?”




   
Reply “Yeah, I’d probably say sort of five, five to ten metres, well probably five, nearer
five”.
00.40.00 4078 “So about as far away again the other side of the wall as you are from this side?”
Reply “Yeah, yeah, probably, yeah, sort of, as when I first, when I first saw them”.

Thanks to the maddiecasefiles for the info.

BlueBag wrote:
New test required.

Gerry McCann - witness statement 04 May 2007, 11.15am

'It is emphasised that one of the members of the group, JANE, at about 21h10/21h15, when she was going to her apartment, to check on her children, saw from the back, at a distance of about 50 metres, on the road bordering the club, an individual carrying a child, wearing pyjamas, JANE will be able to clarify this situation.'

Kate McCann - witness statement 04 May 2007, 14.20pm

'Later, the witness would learn that a member of the group, Russell's partner Jane, at around 9.15pm, when she went to her own apartment to check on her children, saw from behind and at a distance of about 50 metres, on the road along the club, a long-haired person, she thinks wearing jeans, with a child in his arms, walking very quickly. But she is better able to tell about that herself.'

PeterMac wrote:

BlueBag wrote:
New test required.

err, umm, yer 'no
NO.

Gerry and Jez are shown on the pavement.
Gerry insists, under oath - as in on international Television that this is NOT TRUE.
In other words that JANE TANNER IS LYING
He INSISTS he, and JW were on the other side of the road.
So that MUST be true.  Because a McCann has said it.

JW also says, incidentally and a propos of nothing much, and obviously a venomous spotted reptile and lying with all the teeth in his mouth, that HE was where KT put him.
But that is not important
Obviously.

MDee Coy wrote:

PeterMac wrote:

BlueBag wrote:
New test required.

err, umm, yer 'no
NO.

Gerry and Jez are shown on the pavement.
Gerry insists, under oath - as in on international Television that this is NOT TRUE.
In other words that JANE TANNER IS LYING
He INSISTS he, and JW were on the other side of the road.
So that MUST be true.  Because a McCann has said it.

JW also says, incidentally and a propos of nothing much, and obviously a venomous spotted reptile and lying with all the teeth in his mouth, that HE was where KT put him.
But that is not important
Obviously.

One thing I've always wondered about this is why it is so important to undermine Jane so humiliatingly  and put him and Jez at the other side of the road?

Why is this position so important, Gerry?