Witheld/Missing Files

by tuom 19.06.12 23:37

If this has been discussed before please feel free to delete and point me in the right direction , on the files that were not made public do we think these are Very Important , would SY have them now ?? do we think there is much REAL evidence in them ? TY

by Guest 19.06.12 23:54

Here's the link for the missing files...........

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MISSING_PAGES.htm

by Guest 20.06.12 0:07

Interesting to note that there does not appear to be a statement from the Irwins who dined at the same time as the McCanns on the night that Madeleine disappeared. Has anyone seen one? Wouldn't they be able to give valuable information on the comings and goings that night? See this thread.............

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t485-irwin-and-sperrey-statements?highlight=irwin

Here is the tapas booking for 3rd May, as you can see Irwin booked in at 8.30 along with the tapas 9........

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAPAS_BOOKING.htm
Witheld/Missing Files 03_VOLUME_IIIa_Page_608_small

Witheld/Missing Files 03_VOLUME_IIIa_Page_608_small

by dragonfly 20.06.12 0:38

At approximately half past eight, Gerry and Kate and their group of approximately ten people were already seated at their table, which was so close to ours that it was possible to converse with them,

by Guest 20.06.12 10:59

dragonfly wrote: At approximately half past eight, Gerry and Kate and their group of approximately ten people were already seated at their table, which was so close to ours that it was possible to converse with them,

***
That's from Carpenter's statement.

by tuom 21.06.12 18:52

candyfloss wrote:Here's the link for the missing files...........

[url=http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MISSING_PAGES.htm

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MISSING_PAGES.htm[/quote[/url]]

Thank You , am off for a read now Witheld/Missing Files 847771

by jd 21.06.12 19:04

There are a number of vital statements missing from the files. Stands to reason this is because the PJ do not want the mccanns to know exactly what important information they have on them from independent witnesses

by russiandoll 21.06.12 19:17

might the withholding in some cases be simply to protect privacy?

by Guest 21.06.12 19:20

russiandoll wrote:might the withholding in some cases be simply to protect privacy?

If that was the case, then I doubt the Gaspar statements would be included somehow. I think it is more likely to be some sort of evidence that the PJ don't want to be seen.......... until maybe they are ready.

by jd 21.06.12 19:26

russiandoll wrote:might the withholding in some cases be simply to protect privacy?

Not from the statements that have been withheld imo. Its more to catch the Tapas 9 out. The PJ seem very keen on asking the Tapas 9 about the Irwins, clearly they have something very interesting from the Irwin sisters statements

by tuom 22.06.12 0:19

russiandoll wrote:might the withholding in some cases be simply to protect privacy?

Hi Rd , I am very busy with work and my Mother is unwell so I cannot get to reply as quickly as I would like, the privacy issue was my first thought, however on reading through the link that CF gave me I am so confused , all I can see is references to protecting people who have or have had some connection with sexual offences or links to PF (shudder) , or maybe I am reading these files incorrectly ?

by jd 22.06.12 1:44

tuom wrote:
russiandoll wrote:might the withholding in some cases be simply to protect privacy?

Hi Rd , I am very busy with work and my Mother is unwell so I cannot get to reply as quickly as I would like, the privacy issue was my first thought, however on reading through the link that CF gave me I am so confused , all I can see is references to protecting people who have or have had some connection with sexual offences or links to PF (shudder) , or maybe I am reading these files incorrectly ?

If you were a policeman/woman, you would not reveal your true hand, you would keep it close to your chest to catch the suspects out (especially without a body), they are not protecting people though influenced by diplomatic ties it seems. However I do agree that some connection with sexual offences could be at the heart of it somewhere along the line, this aspect is becoming all too apparent

by russiandoll 22.06.12 9:06

Thanks for the replies, folks. I certainly hope that it is because of [ what seems to me] a clear wish not to reveal their hand that certain files have been withheld. I remember reading somewhere about confidentiality regarding certain issues involving people named in them.

by Gillyspot 22.06.12 9:20

They withheld information on unconnected paedophiles. I also see they with held Kate McCann s phone records (but not Gerry's) and also the phone tap evidence obtained on their phones but released some on Murat.

IMO PJ have a reason for withholding some of the information & it won't be to clear the McCanns.

However I can't say the same for the Scotland Yard investigation.