Exclusive: Brian Kennedy’s man in Morocco

listener wrote:The recent and ongoing 'awakening' by the population to the Murcoch, Murdoch and Brooks saga gives me enormous hope, that through the work of TMF and this site (in no particular order), the masses will also wake-up to the facts surrounding 'the stituation Madeleine found herself in' !

Would some kind soul remind me of the family ties between Murdoch & Mitchell because something, very deep, is going on. A few days ago Mitchell was briefly on screen about phone hacking. This was dropped very quickly and completely by the media ?

Tony Bennett wrote:Two people have told me Mitchell is retained, paid and employed by MI5.

ROSA wrote:Is CM a spy ?

Daisy wrote:Thank you, very interesting.
That quote though, attributed to Shakespeare, it's actually Sir Walter Scott.

ROSA wrote:Is CM a spy ?

ufercoffy wrote:Mr B

This article makes for very uncomfortable reading. Is it really possible that Madeleine died accidentally and then all these weird and sinister people suddenly came to Kate and Gerry's aid within a matter of hours? The cast of characters that surround the case of tragic Madeleine McCann is worse than any James Bond film.

ufercoffy, here you have hit on the reason why I first delved into this case deeply back in September 2007. Why was it that the Head of the government's Media Monitoring Unit was sent out to Praia da Luz, then was transferred to the Foreign Office, and was then allowed to 'retire' from the Civil Service in order to work full-time for the McCanns. It spoke to me at the time and still does of course of something very dark and sinister (and certanly illegal) that needed to be covered up.

In this respect can I draw your attention to these two threads:

1. Rogues' Gallery - a parcel of rogues who are closely associated with the McCanns. I am about to amend this list so as to include Antonio Jimenez:

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t2247-rogues-gallery-mccanns-friends

2. The people who rushed out to Praia da Luz - a list of the huge number of people and organisations who rushed out to Portugal to help the McCanns - why?:

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t636-the-people-who-rushed-out-to-praia-da-luz

To answer my own question, and bearing in mind that Mark Warners also sent out its top people, my provisional view is that something illegal was going on that week at Praia da Luz and that Mark Warners knew about it.

It is bad enough that the NHS doctors could be rubbing shoulders with just one dodgy character, but why, and how, so many? The list is ever-growing and endless, how can that be?

Can I draw your attention also to the role of another strange, if not dodgy, character with this case. Namely the late Ray Wyre, the self-proclaimed 'top British expert' on the treatment of paedophiles. As we've explained in one of our in-depth articles about him on our website (see 'Articles' page), his main and long-standing volunteer was an unnamed female who spent years writing to some of the country's most notorious serial killers and murderers. How was it that just 7 days after Madeleine McCann was reported missing, he was able to have a long article published in the Daily Telegraph pontificating that Madeleine must have been abducted by a paedophile. There was alwas something not quite right about Wyre, as we explore in depth in our article. The Wyres and the McCanns spent a day together at the Wyres' home in 2008 when, according to the late Ray Wyre, Dr Kate McCann 'tucked into home made banoffee pie'.

See also here:

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1942-ray-wyre-and-the-mccanns-part-one

and here:

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1499-ray-wyre-plus-his-associate-sally-smith-and-the-mccanns

and here:

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t2468-kate-s-no-pleasure-in-eating-and-watching-tv-contradicted-by-the-late-ray-wyre#61488

I have now reached the point of believing that this case really is a hoax or that this was pre-planned. I cannot see how all these sinister characters crawled out of the woodwork because of an accident.

I think it was Laffin who told us that Mike Gunnill went to Morocco, is he in on this too?

What we know about Mike Gunnill is very little. He is a photojournalist in Kent who takes photos for the press, I think on a freelance basis. He lives within 5 miles of Debbie Butler, our former Chairman. He uses many aliases as has been documented on this forum. One of them was 'Michael Sangerte', a name which he used when writing to me begging me to sell him a copy of '60 Reasons', and stating that he would 'pay a very high price for one' as he needed it for 'historical research'. I eventually sold him a copy for £5 inc. P&P and within a couple of days he was on the now defunct JATYK hate forum boasting that he had rushed down to London to hand that copy of '60 Reasons' to Carter-Ruck and boasting that he was employed by them 'on a mission'. He was the man who took the photos of Debbie Butler that appeared in the Sunday Express on 16 August 2009, headed: 'The McCanns' Stalker' and discussing what became known as the 'Rothley Leaflet Drop' of the '10 Reasons' leaflet. He used subterfuge to try and obtain her address including using the pseudonyms Peter Tarwin and Jason Peters, becoming so confused that he sent me an e-mail with the name 'Tarwin' as part of his e-mail address but signed it 'Jason Peters', a mistake he had to recover from my sending me another e-mail trying to explain his 'mistake'. Probably the defining thing for me about Gunnill is that his website had, for a long time (maybe still does) literally dozens, if not hundreds, of photos of Haut de la Garenne children's home in Jersey, the one where there was terrible abuse of children there for decades by the 'great and the good' of that island. Photos of himself outside Haut de la Garenne were also amongs his public collection. Why would anyone, photographer or otherwise, want to have as the MAIN FEATURE on their website 100-plus photos of Haut de la Garenne, a centre of horrific abuse of those too young and vulnerable to defend themselves? Gunnill has been asked this question but cannot answer it.

As I said on another thread, please be careful.

Your concerns noted, and appreciated. As it happens, I look both ways as I leave the front door just to check if there are any strange cars in view. But our opponents on this matter are so powerful - and we are still some way from the truth and heart of this matter - that they can afford to treat 'truth-seekers' like myself and others on here and elsewhere as no worse a bother than a few troublesome midges on a hot day in Scotland.

aiyoyo wrote:Oh dear if it is really as dark and sinister as that, then there is literally no hope to get to the bottom of this then?

Is it just about a matter of time, or is it was a waste of time really no matter what?

What's going to have to happen before there's a glimpse of hope of explaining the mystery in this case?

If it's top level cover up for paedophiles, why is it there isn't a serial case of similar types of crime involving children of Maddie's age of white middle class families? How do these people operate so that it is well kept under wraps?

ufercoffy wrote:Mr B

The cast of characters that surround the case of tragic Madeleine McCann is worse than any James Bond film.
It is bad enough that the NHS doctors could be rubbing shoulders with just one dodgy character, but why, and how, so many? The list is ever-growing and endless, how can that be?

aiyoyo wrote:Another thing:

IF CM is really part of MI5 why would political leaders or Murdoch's social circle want him near them? How is it that no one in his social circle, work circle or political circle for that matter knows about his MI5 connection?
Surely he's a guy to avoid? OR is it a case of he's a guy to fear?

Willo wrote:

ufercoffy wrote:Mr B - The cast of characters that surround the case of tragic Madeleine McCann is worse than any James Bond film.

I agree it's quite a support group, a really astounding list of contacts.

SNIPPED

Another group would be the Hewlett types, the Australian lady, Murat, eighteen abductors, countless blonde 4 year olds across the world etc. People dragged in just to muddy the waters.

Some maybe with good intentions. Branson for example has seemingly faded of the scene.

SNIPPED

Then there is the hard core that have backed McCanns, most from the early days, these are the people that hold the key. These are the people that are holders of a big secret and by all being connected to the McCann cover up are self-implicating in their guilt by association. One goes they all go. Will this be allowed to happen?
I very much doubt it.

It's too big for truth to even be thought of. The cocky McCanns have known this all along. No matter how hairy...the truth will not out. If it does, blood will be spilled. And even if it doesn't I think some blood will still be spilled. There will be a clean-up.

MORE SNIPPED

ROSA wrote:i think we need to ask
WHO ARE THE MCCANNS ?

willowthewisp wrote:Hi Aiyoyo, 
We may think the McCann's are no one's, but you do not receive that amount of protection/support they have had if they are not holding some one to some sort of ransom on an hidden agenda, with what happened in Portugal 3 May 2007!!?